I didn't make up those letters. I couldn't. They are
real examples which Ihave received from people who would like to become travel
writers. And who wouldn't? But there are ways and ways, and the
aim of this article is to help you get a lot further than the people above did.
As the editor of Traveller magazine, I receive proposals for
articles from travel writers of all kinds - Fleet Street journalists,
published authors, commercial publicists, compulsive travellers and enthusiastic
beginners. And it's clear that there are just as many versions of
what travel writing is: the factual report on a popular destination, the sensitive
literary impression of a distant culture, the free
'plug', the backpacker's tale
of glory, the raw talent that needs a little technical guidance. Which is where you
come in. So let's start at the beginning. What kind of writer do
you want to be - and why?
Let me be Devil's Advocate here and put the case against
becoming a travel writer. Contrary to popular belief, it won't pay
your way around the world. A handful of newspaper and magazine journalists make
a regular living and take a lot of trips, but the rest don't. The rest
are either travelling anyway, or do something else for a living. And even the
successful journalists tend to get short trips that include a lot of factual research
(best hotels, cheapest fares, etc.). If you want to spend time savouring a foreign
culture, it will usually be at your own expense.
Also contrary to popular belief, the reading public is not waiting breathlessly to hear
your - or anyone else's -
personal views on the world and all that is in it. Readers want information that is
useful or interesting in itself: they don't want deeply personal
musings on experiences they are unlikely ever to share.
On the other hand, travel writing might just make you famous. In the wake of Bill
Bryson's global success, the market for travel books seems to
expand inexhaustibly. Since there's almost nowhere on the
planet that's not been written about already, book-publishers are
hungry for new angles on old journeys. Hence some current titles that are weird but
popular - travelling round Ireland carrying a fridge, for example, or
travelling round the globe touching only deserts. And remember that
Bryson's bestsellers are actually based on places most of us can
visit (Europe, Australia, America), but described in his own inimitable style.
Other would-be travel writers do it not for the fame or the money, sensibly enough.
They do it because they genuinely love to write, or because they have been
somewhere that fires them up. In my experience, these are the ones worth
watching. A writer who combines talent and passion can go a long way, eventually.
So how do you get your writing published? If you're a total beginner,
then the classic route is to slowly build up a reputation through journalistic articles
(see below). Having a portfolio of articles in print can help even if
you're aiming at book-publishing, because it gives you credibility
and something solid to show publishers. It gets your name out there, and
establishes your area of expertise.
If your ultimate goal is books rather than articles, you should know that many book-
publishers rely largely on literary agents for new talent, so you might do best to
approach the agents. There are lists of them in the
Writers' and Artists'
Yearbook, or you may have personal contacts who can help. The
classic approach is to send in a one-page summary of your book idea, giving the
overall theme and a breakdown of the chapters, plus a sample chapter in full
- perhaps the opening chapter, so they can see whether you can
grab the audience. You should anticipate quite a long haul as you do the round of
the agents.
But before that, for most writers, comes the stage of trying to sell your work to
newspaper or magazine editors. The rules here are fairly simple:
1. Know the market. Research who is
publishing what, and make sure you send them what they want. There is absolutely
no point in submitting articles which are unsuitable because of style, subject matter
or length. No matter how good they are, they just won't get
published. Equally, find out who takes unsolicited material, and
don't waste your time on those who don't.
2. Choose your angle. You can place the same story with
several publications, if you find a different angle for each. The crucial trick is to find
the angle that will make your material relevant to that particular publication. For
example, a woman writer just back from a safari could find distinct angles for the
women's, environmental and tourism sections of the press.
3. Make a crisp presentation. Send in your ideas on one side
of A4, keep them short and sharp, don't
send too many. You might include back-up material, such as photos or clippings, or
perhaps the whole article, but there should be a cover letter that allows a busy
editor to assess your proposals quickly and easily.
4. Don't waste their time. Journalism is a
high-pressure business and editors are often ridiculously busy.
Don't expect to reach them in person by phone
- but if you do, keep the conversation brief and to the point.
Don't hassle them for decisions they haven't
made yet. But do keep gently reminding them or their staff about your proposal:
polite persistence does pay off.
5. Be reliable. Always meet your deadlines, check your facts,
write to length. If you fail on any of these, you're leaving the
editor in a real pickle. And it won't be forgotten, either. On the
other hand, you'd be surprised at how many journalistic careers
are based on being reliable rather than being brilliant.
If you compare these rules of thumb with the letters quoted at the start of this article,
you can see where they went wrong. The first letter - apart from
its off-putting rudeness - doesn't convey the
proposal at all (rule 3). The second letter doesn't suggest an
angle (rule 2) and would have most editors scared of a deluge of material. The
third letter does have a strong angle but, as the author says, it is unsuitable (rule
1). Interestingly, all three letters break rule 4 in their own delightful ways.
Unfortunately, none of them got far enough to test rule 5.
Much better than these is a straightforward letter like this, which just arrived:
'Dear Mr Lorie, I have spent the last 25
years chasing and photographing the world's last remaining
steam trains. This might interest your readers, perhaps in your
'Eyewitness' section. I enclose the article
written to your length, 25 original photographs of trains in India, and a stamped
addressed envelope for their return. This material has not been published in the
UK before.'
Doesn't it sound intriguing? Wouldn't you want to
know more? The writer has got lots of things right here - for
starters, the name of the editor. He's told us the angle, the
location, and his own credentials for writing about this. It's clear
that he's looked at the magazine and tailored his material to fit
one of the sections. He's also made it easy for the busy editor, by
enclosing the pictures and a reply envelope. Crucially, he's
explained that this article would be a
UK'first': editors love to
publish something before their rivals. And all of that is conveyed in 66 words.
Now we've got a grip on how not to sell a story,
let's consider what not to submit to an editor. He or she
won't want unedited chunks of your travel diaries, since they
won't suit the publication's style. Nor postcard-
style reminiscences of happy holidays, which are too personal to interest the
general reader. Nor thinly disguised 'plugs' for
hotels/tour agents/resorts/airlines or anyone else who's obviously
done the author some favour or other. Nor, sadly, reminiscences of the travels of
ten, 20 or even 30 years ago: no matter how much they
mean to the author, they won't be topical enough for the editor.
What the editor does want to receive is material that suits his or her publication, is
entertainingly written, and tells the reader something worth knowing. It must be up-
to-date and accurate. It should be written in 'house
style'. It could be topical. And it helps if the story can be easily
illustrated with photographs. Getting of all that right will get you in print.
So, having passed the test and got your proposal or article accepted, what happens
next? My best advice is to regard the publication of your article as a beginning
rather than an end. Regard that magazine or newspaper as your prime target, on
the assumption that if they liked your material once, they will do again. Try to work
out why that particular article got published, and offer them the same
'formula' a second or third time. Try to build
some contacts there: perhaps get known for some area of expertise on which they
might call you. Crucially, start a contact book in which to note any useful names
and addresses, and keep careful track of your submissions and conversations.
With this combination of professionalism and patience, you might find that first article
in print is a door opening into your future.